Top 5 Pro’s and Con’s for using Nitrogen instead of Carbon Dioxide to Carbonate Beer
Carbonation is an essential process in the production of beer that imparts the characteristic fizz and mouthfeel that many beer lovers crave. Traditionally, carbon dioxide (CO2) has been the preferred gas used to carbonate beer.
However, in recent years, nitrogen (N2) has emerged as an alternative that offers some distinct advantages. In this article, we will examine the pros and cons of using nitrogen instead of carbon dioxide to carbonate beer.
Pros of using nitrogen to carbonate beer:
Smooth and creamy mouthfeel — Nitrogen bubbles are smaller and less effervescent than carbon dioxide bubbles, resulting in a smooth and creamy mouthfeel. This is especially desirable in stout and porter beers, where a rich and velvety texture is preferred.
Improved head retention — Nitrogen bubbles create a denser and more stable foam than carbon dioxide bubbles, resulting in improved head retention. This not only looks great in the glass but also enhances the aroma and flavor of the beer.
Reduced oxidation — Nitrogen is inert and does not react with beer components, which reduces the risk of oxidation during the carbonation process. This results in a fresher and longer-lasting beer.
Lower carbonation level — Nitrogen is less soluble in liquid than carbon dioxide, which means that less nitrogen is needed to achieve the same level of carbonation as carbon dioxide. This results in a lower carbonation level, which is preferable in some beer styles.
Unique serving experience — Nitrogen is often used to dispense beer on tap, resulting in a unique cascading effect that creates a mesmerizing visual experience for customers. This can be a great marketing tool for breweries looking to stand out from the competition.
Cons of using nitrogen to carbonate beer:
Expensive equipment — Nitrogen requires special equipment, including a nitrogen generator and a specialised faucet, which can be expensive and may not be feasible for smaller breweries.
Longer conditioning time — Nitrogen takes longer to dissolve in beer than carbon dioxide, which can result in a longer conditioning time for nitrogenated beers.
Limited applicability — Nitrogen is not suitable for all beer styles, as some require higher carbonation levels that are best achieved with carbon dioxide.
Reduced bitterness perception — Nitrogen’s smaller bubbles can reduce the perception of bitterness in hop-forward beers, which may be a disadvantage in some beer styles.
Carbonation adjustments — Adjusting the carbonation level of nitrogenated beers can be more challenging than with carbon dioxide, which may require additional equipment or expertise.
In conclusion, using nitrogen to carbonate beer can offer several advantages, including a smooth and creamy mouthfeel, improved head retention, reduced oxidation, a lower carbonation level, and a unique serving experience.
However, it also has some drawbacks, including expensive equipment, longer conditioning times, limited applicability, reduced bitterness perception, and challenges in carbonation adjustments. Therefore, breweries should carefully consider the pros and cons before deciding whether to use nitrogen or carbon dioxide for their beer carbonation.
Or join our FaceBook page ‘Let’s Brew Beer’ and find out how to brew your own beer at home.
